Google Search Antitrust Case (Alphabet) Update; Know-How It Will Affect You In Simple Words | US case against Google's dadagiri in search; Know what will be the effect in India? » India News
Connect with us

India News

Google Search Antitrust Case (Alphabet) Update; Know-How It Will Affect You In Simple Words | US case against Google’s dadagiri in search; Know what will be the effect in India?

Published

on

6 minutes agoAuthor: Ravindra Bhajani

  • Copy link
  • After Europe and America, Japan and Australia also hinted at challenging the monopoly of tech companies like Google.
  • Google’s answer – We did not force anyone, people use to search on their own.

In the US, the Justice Department and 11 states have filed a case on Google, the most used search engine. He is accused of illegally making exclusive deals with Apple and smartphone makers to eliminate competition and establish his monopoly.

This is the largest lawsuit against a technology firm in over two decades. Earlier in 1998 a similar lawsuit was also filed against Microsoft. By the way, accusations have been made on Google even before. Now reports are also coming that Australia and Japan are also preparing to challenge the monopoly of big tech companies with Europe and America.

In such a situation, it is important to know that what are the allegations against Google in these cases? What can be the effect? Let’s find the answers to these questions …

First, what is the lawsuit and who has done it?

  • In the US, the Justice Department and 11 different states have filed this antitrust case against Google. The 64-page complaint alleged that Google had exclusive deals to acquire more than 90% market share in the search engine business. This made Google the default search engine for users on these devices.
  • Google paid billions of dollars to mobile makers, carriers, and browsers from their advertising revenue to make Google a pre-set search engine on their devices. This secured Google the top position on millions of devices and denied them the opportunity to establish themselves for other search engines.
  • It is also alleged that Apple and Google resorted to each other and outshone their competitors. About half of Google’s search traffic in the US came from Apple’s iPhones. At the same time, one-fifth of Apple’s profit came from Google.
  • Google stopped innovation. Finished choice for users and affected service quality like privacy data. Google took advantage of its position and did not allow other companies or startups to innovate. The Justice Department has registered the case after nearly a year of investigation.

What is Google’s answer to the US government’s allegations?

  • Google’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker says the lawsuit is baseless. People use Google and this is their decision. Google has not forced anyone to use its services. The option is present if they need it.
  • He says that companies are not being able to compete in the market under the pretext of antitrust law. Google pays Apple and other smartphone companies so that it can get shelf space to reach as many people as possible. There is nothing wrong in this.
  • Walker also said that the design of the American Anti-Trust Law is not designed to strengthen a weak competitor. There are equal opportunities for everyone here. This case is not going to last much in court. Any service that Google gives to users is free. There is no question of loss to anyone else.

What is the politics behind this lawsuit?

  • From the time of filing this lawsuit, many questions are arising regarding the states involved in this lawsuit. This lawsuit has been filed in the US just two weeks before the presidential election. Generally, any step is afraid of having an impact on elections, because of this, no major steps are taken by the government.
  • Importantly, in the 11 states that have supported the Justice Department, all Attorney Generals are Republicans. The reality is that all 50 states of the US started investigations against Google a year ago, but only Republican states have filed cases. In some states, the investigation has not even been completed.

What can be the outcome of a case?

  • In such a case, the trial goes on for a long time and it takes two to three years to come to a decision. A similar lawsuit was filed against Microsoft in 1998, which ended on settlement.
  • Google had previously faced similar allegations in Europe. If the company loses, it will have to make some changes in its structure. At the same time, if it wins, then big tech companies will get more strength. This will shock the efforts of governments to overcome them.
  • It is certain that the outcome of the trial will take time. There is an election in America on November 3 and the new government will have to fight this case. Democrats have long argued that the provisions of anti-trust law need to be changed in the new digital age.

Can action be taken against Google in India too?

  • The Competition Commission of India (CCI) in India aims to end a company’s monopoly in the market. He promotes the Healthy Competition. CCI is already investigating similar complaints in the US.
  • A similar situation was created last month on the issue of Google vs Paytm, When Google took advantage of its position, Paytm’s app was removed from the Play Store. Even then, Paytm had made the same allegations that Google discriminates between itself and other apps.
  • News agency Reuters reported a few days ago that the Competition Commission of India is investigating Google’s involvement in the smart TV market. The case relates to the supply of Android operating systems installed in smart TVs, which are pre-installed in most smart TVs sold in India.

What are the law experts of India saying?

  • Cyber ​​law expert and Supreme Court lawyer Virag Gupta says that if there is an action to end Google’s corporate supremacy in America, then it will also have an impact in India. Companies like Google have established their chaotic dominance in India as compared to America.
  • According to the Senior Advocate, it is necessary to make new laws and change the old laws in India. India has recently enacted several restrictive rules regarding FDI from China and Pakistan. On the same lines, it is necessary for the tech companies to change the rules of company law, IT law and income tax law.
  • Gupta says that there is a large-scale procurement of data from these companies. It is necessary to curb this so that government revenue can be increased. The CCI system needs to be reformed to challenge the monopoly of these companies in India.

Advertisement

bareilly